Please start any new threads on our new 
    site at https://forums.sqlteam.com.  We've got lots of great SQL Server
    experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
    
        
            
                
                    
                        
                            
                                | Author | 
                                
                                 Topic  | 
                             
                            
                                    | 
                                         Bambola 
                                        Posting Yak  Master 
                                         
                                        
                                        103 Posts  | 
                                        
                                        
                                            
                                            
                                             Posted - 2009-07-10 : 09:54:17
                                            
  | 
                                             
                                            
                                            | Hi guys,I've been running a DBCC CHECKTABLE with repair on a damanges table (consistency errors - no reference to text field - had no choice but to ran checktable allowing data lose). I had this problems on 2 database that have the same structure.Here is my codeexec sp_dboption my_db ,'single','true' dbcc checktable(my_table, REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS)exec sp_dboption my_db ,'single','false' Everything seemed to have gone well, and consistency errors were fixed for both databases. but in the morning I found one of the databases in single user mode!I remember clearly that after switching back to multi-user I recieved the message saying database is already in a multi-user mode. I though I must have run the sp_dboption statement twice... Seems like exec sp_dboption my_db ,'single','false' did nothing without a warning. On the contrary, it was giving a "false" message.Is that a known bug? any ideas?Thanks! | 
                                             
                                         
                                     | 
                             
       
                            
                            
                                | 
                                    
                                      
                                     
                                    
                                 | 
                             
                         
                     | 
                 
             
         |