Please start any new threads on our new
site at https://forums.sqlteam.com. We've got lots of great SQL Server
experts to answer whatever question you can come up with.
| Author |
Topic |
|
MichaelP
Jedi Yak
2489 Posts |
 Posted - 2002-08-09 : 12:11:54
|
| I'm curious to see what real world application performance advantages / disadvantages .Net has over VB6 and ASP3.From what I've gather so far, SQL database access is faster, but you need faster / more hardware to Run the .Net applications.Am I off base? Michael<Yoda>Use the Search page you must. Find the answer you will.</Yoda> |
|
|
chadmat
The Chadinator
1974 Posts |
Posted - 2002-08-11 : 02:18:01
|
| You shouldn't need a hardware upgrade unless you are running really old stuff. Just lod the CLR/.Net framework, and .Net apps will run. That doesn't really answer your question though. I haven't done any testing on performance between old ASP and ASP.Net, but I would bet ASP.Net is much faster particularly if you take advantage of the cacheing available.-Chad |
 |
|
|
graz
Chief SQLTeam Crack Dealer
4149 Posts |
Posted - 2002-08-11 : 09:31:07
|
| In every non-scientific test I've tried, .NET has been faster.===============================================Creating tomorrow's legacy systems today.One crisis at a time. |
|
|
|
Argyle
Yak Posting Veteran
53 Posts |
|
|
BigRetina
Posting Yak Master
144 Posts |
Posted - 2002-08-13 : 08:56:37
|
| SQL server is REALLY fast in VB.NET. I think that this has to do with the SQL data provider using the SQL Tabular Data Stream protocol directly without any proxies!.. |
|
|
|
Nico
Starting Member
18 Posts |
Posted - 2002-08-31 : 00:21:59
|
| I've thought ASP.NET webpages to be rather slow and cumbersome because of all the page transitions and the amount of data being sent back and forth from/to the server.For beginners and/or lazy programmers, I think that ASP is faster. Advanced users can go for caching and such, in order to make ASP.NET more efficient and faster. On the other hand, ASP.NET doesn't seem to encourage the use of frames.Also, it's too bad that ASP.NET doesn't support Remote Data Services.Personally I'm not too impressed. I only like the OO architecture. |
|
|
|
Onamuji
Aged Yak Warrior
504 Posts |
Posted - 2002-08-31 : 10:47:36
|
.NET hands down... of course the better system you have (RAM is important for caching) Of course the initial load of the page is slow because it is compiled (just like JSPs) It is my personal opinion that people that put down .NET have never tried it or are not object-oriented programmers... After the first several pages I did for the application I'm developing in .NET I swore I would never go back to VB or ASP... of course I still have to maintain a few applications like that .. I will work my way around converting everything! I suggest you get on board because .NET will change your life (as a programmer)...it makes me happy  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VB.Net / ASP.Net Performance